Ambulatory epidural analgesia during uncomplicated obstetric labour: Feasibility study at the Centre hospitalier intercommunal Villeneuve Saint Georges

Research Article


Abstract views: 38 / PDF downloads: 28

Authors

  • Wilfrid Mbombo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58372/2835-6276.1131

Keywords:

epidural analgesia ambulatory Villeuve St Georges hospital centre

Abstract

Objective: The study was carried out to assess the feasibility of walking under obstetric epidural analgesia at the Villeneuve St Georges Inter-communal Hospital (VSGIH).

Methods: The study population consisted of parturient who consulted a labour and delivery unit during the study period, and the nursing staff of this ward.

Results: During the study period, only 33 women (37%) out of a possible 87 agreed to walk around, 40 did not do so because they were tired and 16 refused to take part in the study. Of the 33 patients recruited, 5 did not walk because of fatigue at the time the procedure was carried out. The mean age was 30.33 years, all classified as ASA II. More than 78% were undergoing first or second gestures, and almost 50% had their epidural inserted at 3cm cervical dilatation. Ambulation took place during the day in 90% of patients, with 50% of them completing a single slot for an average duration of 69.5 minutes in the 1st slot. The main reason for stopping walking was fatigue in 36% of patients.   96% of patients were not aware of the possibility of ambulation under epidural during labour, and all women were satisfied after ambulation. More than a third of the nursing staff who took part in the study (66.7%) thought that the walking under obstetric epidural analgesia (WUOEA) was safe, and 15 of them (71.4%) thought that it was easy to use. The obstacles to implementing the WUOEA were: the absence of wireless monitoring (42.9%), very restrictive selection criteria (23.8%), lack of patient motivation (19%), and fear of the safety of the technique.

Conclusion: The effective and permanent introduction of ambulatory epidural analgesia is possible at the Villeneuve Saint Georges Intercommunal Hospital. New equipment, in particular the wireless monitor, is required for this purpose.

References

Accouchement normal : accompagnement de la physiologie et interventions médicales. Recommandation de bonne pratique clinique. HAS. Mise en ligne le 25 janv 2018- Mis à jour le 27 nov.2023.

Laurie Girard. Effet de la déambulation sous anesthésie péridurale déambulatoire sur la durée de la phase active et le déroulement du travail obstétrical : étude prospective unicentrique. Gynécologie et obstétrique. 2020. Ffdumas-03047956f.

Lawrence A, Lewis L, Hofmeyr G-J, Styles C. Maternal positions and mobility during first stage labour: Cochrane data base Syst Rev October 2013; 9(10):CD003934. DOI:10.10002/14651858.CD003934.pub4.

Bullingham A, Liang S, Edmonds E, Mathur S, Sharma S. Continuous epidural infusionvs programmed intermittent epidural bolus for labour analgesia: a prospective, controlled, before-and-after cohort study of labour outcomes. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Aug ; 121(2) : 432-37. DOI : 10.1016/j.bja.2018.03.038.

Enquête nationale périnatale, Rapport 2021 : Les naissances, le suivi à deux mois et les établissements ; situation et évolution depuis 2016. République française/Santé Publique France/INSERM.

Ducloy Bouthors A-S. Déambulation, ballon et postures pendant le travail obstétrical : où en est-on ? 2022. https:/www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1279796022000869.

Simoneau E, Elmaleh Y, Imauven O. Péridurale déambulatoire pour le travail obstétrical/ pourquoi et comment. Le Praticien en Anesthésie. 2023 ; volume 27, Issue 3, p155-59.

Cyndel D’Incau. La déambulation pendant le travail : état des lieux de la pratique à la maternité des hôpitaux du Léman. Gynécolgie et obstétrique.2016.ff dumas-01349664f.

Cohen SE, Yeh JY, Riley ET, Vogel TM. Walking with labor epidural analgesia: the impact of bupivacaine concentration and a lidocaine-epinephrine test dose. Anesthesiology 2000; 92(2):387-2. DOI: 10.1097/00132586-200012000-000018.

Abrahams M, Higgins P, Whyte P, Breen P, Muttu S, Gardiner J. PIntact proprioception and control of labour pain during epidural analgesia. Acta Anaesthesiol scand 1999; 43(1):46-50. DOI:10.1034/j.1399-6576.1999.430111.x.

Capogna, G, Camorcia M, Stirparo S, Farcomeni A. Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Versus Continuous Epidural Infusion for Labor Analgesia:The Effects on Maternal Motor Function and Labor Outcome. A Randomized Double-Blind Study in Nulliparous Women. Anesth Analgesia 2011; 113(4):826-31.

Frenea S, Chirossel C, Rodriguez R, Baguet J-P, Racinet C, Payen J-F. The effects of prolonged ambulation on labor with epidural analgesia. Anesth Analg; 2004; 98 (1) 224-29. DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000090317.01876.D9.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-31

How to Cite

Wilfrid Mbombo. (2024). Ambulatory epidural analgesia during uncomplicated obstetric labour: Feasibility study at the Centre hospitalier intercommunal Villeneuve Saint Georges: Research Article. American Journal of Medical and Clinical Research & Reviews, 3(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.58372/2835-6276.1131

Issue

Section

Articles