Navigating the Boundaries: Dialogical Medical Practice and the Challenge of Pseudoscience: Review Article

Julian Ungar-Sargon

doi:10.58372/2835-6276.1300

Authors

Julian Ungar-Sargon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58372/2835-6276.1300

Keywords:

medical dialogue, evidence-based medicine, patient-centered care, medical epistemology, clinical communication, healthcare innovation, pseudoscience prevention, professional development, medical education, cultural competence

Abstract

Contemporary healthcare faces mounting pressure to balance evidence-based medical protocols with patient-centered care, cultural competence, and physician professional satisfaction. My "dialogical medical practice" framework applies theological models of creative engagement to this challenge, but its relationship to current concerns about medical pseudoscience requires careful examination.

To analyze how this framework for dialogical medical practice intersects with established criteria for distinguishing legitimate healthcare innovation from medical pseudoscience, identifying both strengths and areas requiring strategic clarification.

Critical analysis of the dialogical medical practice framework using established philosophical and medical criteria for evaluating pseudoscience, including Boudry's pragmatic-naturalistic approach to demarcation, the World Medical Association's Declaration on Pseudoscience, and Callaghan's analysis of medical denialism. Examination of theological foundations, epistemological commitments, and practical implications for medical education and clinical practice.

The framework demonstrates remarkable sophistication in avoiding pseudoscience characteristics by maintaining explicit commitment to evidence-based medicine, working within established medical authority, and focusing on communication enhancement rather than alternative treatments. Key strengths include sophisticated epistemological foundations, professional integration approach, and potential to address physician burnout while improving patient satisfaction. Areas requiring strategic clarification include language around "alternative healing traditions," boundaries between patient narratives and clinical evidence, and protocols for implementing flexible clinical approaches without undermining evidence-based guidelines.

Dialogical medical practice represents a promising approach to healthcare improvement that successfully navigates most concerns about medical pseudoscience. With strategic clarifications around implementation boundaries and explicit positioning as medical communication innovation, this framework provides valuable resources for enhancing evidence-based medicine through improved patient engagement and cultural competence. The theological models offer unique insights for professional development that could significantly impact healthcare quality while preserving scientific integrity.

References

Ungar-Sargon J. From Medical Orthodoxy to Dialogical Practice: Applying Theological Models of Creative Engagement to Contemporary Healthcare. Dominican University IL; 2025.

Elman Y. R. Zadok Hakohen on the History of Halakha. Tradition. 1985;21(4):4-26.

Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, et al. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 1996;312(7023):71-72.

Boudry M, Blancke S, Pigliucci M. What Makes Weird Beliefs Thrive? The Epidemiology of Pseudoscience. Philosophical Psychology. 2014;28(8):1177-1198.

Soloveitchik JB. The Lonely Man of Faith. New York: Doubleday; 1992.

Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington: National Academy Press; 2001.

World Medical Association. WMA Declaration on Pseudoscience and Pseudotherapies in the field of health. Cordoba, Spain; 2020.

Ernst E, Singh S. Trick or Treatment: The Undeniable Facts About Alternative Medicine. New York: W. W. Norton; 2008.

Callaghan C. Pseudoscience in medicine: cautionary recommendations. Afr Health Sci. 2019;19(4):3118-3126.

Guyatt G, Cairns J, Churchill D, et al. Evidence-based medicine: A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA. 1992;268(17):2420-2425.

Ernst E. A systematic review of systematic reviews of homeopathy. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;54(6):577-582.

Stewart M, Brown JB, McWhinney IR, et al. Patient-Centered Medicine: Transforming the Clinical Method. 3rd ed. London: Radcliffe Publishing; 2014.

Halivni DW. Revelation Restored: Divine Writ and Critical Responses. Boulder: Westview Press; 1997.

Haynes RB, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH. Clinical expertise in the era of evidence-based medicine and patient choice. ACP J Club. 2002;136(2):A11-14.

Novella S. The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe: How to Know What's Really Real in a World Increasingly Full of Fake. New York: Grand Central Publishing; 2018.

Levinson W, Roter D, Mullooly JP, et al. Physician-patient communication: the relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. JAMA. 1997;277(7):553-559.

Gorski DH. Integrative oncology: really the best of both worlds? Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14(10):692-700.

Shanafelt TD, Hasan O, Dyrbye LN, et al. Changes in Burnout and Satisfaction With Work-Life Balance Among Physicians and Comparison With the US Population Between 2011 and 2014. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(12):1600-1613.

Callaghan C. Pseudoscience in medicine: cautionary recommendations. Afr Health Sci. 2019;19(4):3118-3126.

World Medical Association. WMA Declaration on Pseudoscience and Pseudotherapies in the field of health. Cordoba, Spain; 2020.

Sierpina V, Frenkel MA. Integrative medicine education: the patient, the physician, and the patient-physician relationship. Explore (NY). 2005;1(4):246-253.

Epstein RM, Hadee T, Carroll J, et al. "Could this be something serious?" Reassurance, uncertainty, and physician self-efficacy in primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2007;5(5):455-464.

Little P, Everitt H, Williamson I, et al. Observational study of effect of patient centredness and positive approach on outcomes of general practice consultations. BMJ. 2001;323(7318):908-911.

Baker A. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. BMJ. 2001;323(7322):1192.

Lichtenstein A. Leaves of Faith: The World of Jewish Learning. Jersey City: Ktav; 2003.

Magid S. American Post-Judaism: Identity and Renewal in a Postethnic Society. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 2013.

Kalman J. The Song of Songs and the Editor of Editors: On the Implications of the Netziv's Rinah Shel Torah. Journal for Semitics. 2014;23(2ii):720-747.