Integrative Techniques of Cardiotocography : Research Article

Felis S

doi:10.58372/2835-6276.1083

Authors

Felis S

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58372/2835-6276.1083

Keywords:

ST-Analysis, STAN, Cardiotocography, Fetal ECG, Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring

Abstract

ST-analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) (STAN (®)) combined with cardiotocography (CTG) for intrapartum fetal monitoring has been developed following many years of animal research. Changes in the ST-segment of the fetal ECG correlated with fetal hypoxia occurring during labor. In 1993 the first randomized controlled trial (RCT), comparing CTG with CTG + ST-analysis was published. STAN (®) was introduced for daily practice in 2000. To date, six RCTs have been performed, out of which five have been published. Furthermore, there are six published meta-analyses. The meta-analyses showed that CTG + ST-analysis reduced the risks of vaginal operative delivery by about 10% and fetal blood sampling by 40%. There are conflicting results regarding the effect on metabolic acidosis, much because of controversies about which RCTs should be included in a meta-analysis, and because of differences in methodology, execution and quality of the meta-analyses. Several cohort studies have been published, some showing significant decrease of metabolic acidosis after the introduction of ST-analysis. In this review, we discuss not only the scientific evidence from the RCTs and meta-analyses, but also the limitations of these studies. In conclusion, ST-analysis is effective in reducing operative vaginal deliveries and fetal blood sampling but the effect on neonatal metabolic acidosis is still under debate. Further research is needed to determine the place of ST-analysis in the labor ward for daily practice.

References

Alfirevic Z., Devane D., Gyte GML.: Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labor – Cochrane database of Systematic Reviews Issue 3, 2006.

Hon EH., Quilligan EJ.: The classification of fetal heart rate. II: a revised working classification. - Conn. Med. 31 (11): 779-784,1967.

Nelson KB., Dambrosia JM., Ting TY., Grether JK.: Uncertain value of electronic fetal monitoring in predicting cerebral palsy- N. Engl. J. Med. 334 (10) :613-618, 1996.

Widmark C., Lindecrantz K., Murray H., Rosen KG.: Changes in the PR, RR intervals and ST waveform of the fetal lamb elettrocardiogram with acute hypoxemia – J. Dev. Physiol. 18 (3): 99-103, 1992.

Westgate JA., Gunn AJ., Bennet L., Gunning MI., De Haan HH., Gluckman PD.: Do fetal electrocardiogram PR-RR changes reflect progressive asphyxia after repeated umbilical cord occlusion in fetal sheep? - Pediatr Res 44 (3): 297-303,1998.

Hokegard KH., Eriksson Bo., Kjellmer I., Magno R., Rosen KG.: Myocardial metabolism in relation to electrocardiographic changes and cardiac function during graded hypoxia in the fetal lamb – Acta Physiol Scand 113 (1): 1-7, 1981.

Amer- Wahlin I., Arulkumaran S., Hagberg H., Marsal K., Visser GHA.: Fetal electrocardiogram ST waveform analysis in intrapartum surveillance – BJOG 114: 1191-1193, 2007.

Amer- Wahlin I.: Fetal ECG waveform analysis for intrapartum monitoring – University of Lund, 2003.

Rosen KG: Intrapartum fetal monitoring and fetal ECG-time for a change. Arch. Perinat. Med. 7:7-12, 2001.

Widmark C., Lindecrantz K., Murray H., Rosen KG.: Changes in the PR, RR intervals and ST waveform of the fetal lamb electrocardiogram with acute Hypoxemia. J. Dev. Physiol. 18 (3): 99-103,1992.

Westgate JA., Greene K.: How well is fetal blood sampling used in clinical practice? Br. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 101 (3) :250-251, 1994.

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Umbilical cord blood gas and acid base analysis. ACOG Committee Opinion. Obstet Gynecol 108 (5) :1319-1322,2006

Valensise H., Felis S., Ghi T., Vasapollo B.: Sorveglianza fetale in travaglio di parto – Cap. 5 pag. 127-189. CIC ediz Internazionali 2009

Westgate J, Harris M, Curnow JS.: Plymouth randomised trial of cardiotocogram only versus ST waveform plus cardiotocogram for intrapartum monitoring: 2400 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169:1151e60.

Amer-Wåhlin I, Hellsten C, Noren H.: Cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST-analysis of fetal electrocardiogram for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a Swedish randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2001; 358:534e8.

Ojala K, Vaarasmaki M, Makikallio K, et al.: A comparison of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography and conventional cardiotocography - a randomised controlled study. BJOG 2006; 113:419e23.

Vayssiere C, David E, Meyer N, et al.: A French randomized controlled trial of ST-segment analysis in a population with abnormal cardiotocograms during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197:299e306.

Westerhuis ME, Visser GH, Moons KG, et al. Cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram compared with cardiotocography only for intrapartum monitoring: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115:1173e80

Belfort MA., Saade GR., Thom E.: A randomized trial of intrapartum fetal ECG ST analysis. N Engl. J Med. 2015; 373: 632-41

Nelson JP.: fetal electrocardiogramm (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labor. Cochrane database Syst. Rev 2006 3): CD000116

Olofsson P., Ayres de Campo D., Kessler J.: A critical appraisal of the evidence for using cardiotocography plus ECG ST interval analysis for fetal surveillance in labor. Part I: the randomized controlled trials. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014; 93:556-68

Olofsson P., Ayres de Campo D., Kessler J.: A critical appraisal of the evidence for using cardiotocography plus ECG ST interval analysis for fetal surveillance in labor. Part II: the meta-analyses. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014; 93:571-86

Becker JH, Bax L, Amer-Wåhlin I, et al. ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in intrapartum fetal monitoring: a metaanalysis. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119:145e54.

Potti S, Berghella V. ST waveform analysis versus cardiotocography alone for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a metaanalysis of randomized trials. Am J Perinatol 2012;29(8):657e64.

Salmelin A, Wiklund I, Bottinga R, et al. Fetal monitoring with computerised ST analysis during labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013; 92:28e39.

Schuit E, Amer Wahlin I, Ojala K, et al. Effectiveness of electronic fetal monitoring with additional ST analysis in vertex singleton pregnancies beyond 36 weeks of gestation: an individual participant data meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208(187): e1e13.

Luzietti R, Erkkola R, Hasbergen U, et al. European community multi-center trial “fetal ECG during labour”: ST plus CTG analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonat Med 1999; 27:431e4.

Amer Wahlin I, Bordahl P, Eikeland T, et al. ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram during labor: nordic observational multicenter study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2002; 12:260e6.

Kwee A, Van der Hoorn-van den Beld CW, Veerman J, et al. STAN®S21-monitor for fetal surveillance during labour: an observational study in 637 patients. J Matern Fet Neonat Med 2004; 15:400e7.

Ross MG, Devoe LD, Rosen KG. ST-segment analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram improves fetal heart rate tracing interpretation and clinical decision making. J Matern Fetal Neonat Med 2004; 15:181e5.

Devoe LD, Ross M, Wilde C, et al. United states multicenter clinical usage study of the STAN 21 electronic fetal monitoring system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195:729e34.

Noren H, Blad S, carlsson A, et al. STAN in clinical practice-the outcome of 2 years of regular use in the city of Gothenburg. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195:7e15.

Welin AK, Noren H, Odeback A, et al. STAN, a clinical audit: the outcome of 2 years of regular use in the city of Varberg, Sweden. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007; 86:827e32.

Kale A, Chong YS, Biswas A. Effect of availability of fetal ECG monitoring on operative deliveries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008; 87:1189e93.

Massoud M, Giannessi A, Amabile N, et al. Fetal electrocardiotocography in labor and neonatal outcome: an observational study in 1889 patients in the French center of Edouard Herriot. Lyon J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2007; 20:819e24.

Doria V, Papageorghiou AT, Gustafsson A, et al. Review of the first 1502 cases of ECG-ST waveform analysis during labour in a teaching hospital. BJOG 2007; 114:1202e7.

Palmgren-Colov NS. Need for extensive education when implementing new foetal monitoring technology. Ugeskr Laeger 2007; 169:3294e7.

Melin M, Bonnevier A, Cardell M, et al. Changes in the ST-interval segment of the fetal electrocardiogram in relation to acid-base status at birth. BJOG 2008; 115:1669e75.

Rzepka R, Torbe A, Kwiatkowski S, et al. Clinical outcomes of high-risk labours monitored using fetal electrocardiography. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2010; 39:27e32.

Noren H, Carlsson A. Reduced prevalence of metabolic acidosis at birth: an analysis of established STAN-usage in the total population of deliveries in a Swedish district hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202(546): E1e7.

Ragupathy K, Ismail F, Nicoll AE. The use of STAN monitoring in the labour ward. J Obstet Gynaecol 2010; 30:1191e3.

Doret M, Massoud M, Constans A, et al. Use of peripartum ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram without blood sampling: a large prospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011; 156:35e40.

Blix E., Brurberg KG., Reierth E., reinar LM., Oian P.: ST waveform analysis vs. cardiotocography alone for intrapartum fetal monitoring: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015; 95 :16-27.

Amer-Wahlin I., Kallen K., Herbst A.: Implementation of new medical techniques: experience from the Swedish randomized controlled trial on fetal ECG during labor: J Maternal Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005; 18: 93-100

Doria V, AT Papageorghiou AT., Gustafsson A., Ugwumadu A., Farrer., ArulkumaranS.: Impact of fetal ECG (STAN) and competency-based training on intrapartum interventions and perinatal outcomes at a teaching hospital in London: 5 years analysis. BJOG 2013

Saling E.: Amnioscopy and foetal blood sampling observations on foetal acidosis. Arch Dis. Child 1966;41.472-6

National Insitute of Clinical Excellence. Intrapartum Care: care of healthy women and their babies during labor. NICE Clinical Guidelines. N. 55, London, NICE; September 2007

Alfirevic Z. Devane D., Gyte GML.: Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labor. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.2013: CD006006

Schaap TP., Moormann KA., Becker JH.: Cerebrospinal fluif leakage, an uncommon complication of fetal blood sampling: a case report and review of the literature. Obstet. Gynecol Surv. 2011;66: 42-6

Tuffnell D., Haw WL., Wilkinson K.: How long does a fetal scalp blood sample take? BJOG 2006; 113:332-4

Annappa R., Campbell DJ., Simpson NA.: Fetal blood sampling in labour and the decision to delivery interval. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2008; 141:10-12

East CE., Leader LR., Sheehan P.: Intrapartum fetal scalp lactate sampling for fetal assessment in the presence of a non – reassuring fetal heart rate trace. Cochrane database Syst. Rev. 2015; 5: CD006174

Skupski DW., Rosenberg CR., Eglinton GS.: Intrapartum fetal stimulation tests: a meta-analysis. Obstet. Gynecol 2002; 99: 129-34

Emliminia A., Figueroa R., Tejani N.: Intrapartum assessment of fetal well-being: a comparison of scalp stimulation with scalp blood pH sampling. Obstet. Gynecol. 1997; 89: 373-6

Chandraharan E.: Should national guidelines continue to recommend fetal scalp blood sampling during labor? The Journal of Maternal-Fetal &Neonatal Medicine, 29:22, 3682-3685, 2016