Labor induction in case of Fetal Growth Restriction (FGR)
Research Article
Abstract views: 210 / PDF downloads: 67
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58372/2835-6276.1078Keywords:
Doppler, Fetal growth restriction, Induction, Preterm birthAbstract
Clinicians consider a range of variables when formulating decisions regarding the diagnosis, monitoring plan, and ultimately the decision to recommend the delivery of a growth-restricted fetus. The differential diagnosis of a pathological fetal growth pattern is initially considered via the history, a physical and laboratory examination of the pregnant person, as well as a comprehensive fetal ultrasound examination. These factors allow a broad distinction between pre-existing disease in the pregnant person, constitutionally small normal growth, placenta-mediated Fetal Growth Restriction (FGR), and intrinsic fetal disease. Most commonly, pathological growth restriction is mediated by underlying placental diseases, of which maternal vascular malperfusion is the most common, and often results in co-existent hypertension. A program of combined monitoring of the pregnant person and fetus, comprising hypertension assessment, and serial fetal ultrasound, including Doppler studies is then instituted, and may be combined with biochemical markers, such as Placental Growth Factor, for greater clinical precision. Recommendations on timing to deliver the growth-restricted fetus worldwide are converging, with similar guidance from clinical practice guidelines informed by high-quality Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and large cohort studies. In most instances, it is reasonable to recommend delivery of all growth-restricted fetuses by approximately 38 weeks. Timing of delivery should take into consideration both short-term neonatal outcomes and long-term outcomes at school age. Mode of delivery is based on many factors, and induction of labor is a safe approach, especially after 34 weeks. Mechanical methods of induction may be preferred to pharmacologic methods, although both have a role and the choice of method is based on individualized assessment. Elective Cesarean birth thereby bypassing fetal stress during labor, is recommended in preterm growth-restricted fetuses with signs of adaptive fetal compromise, especially when ductus venosus flow is abnormal, or a contraction stress test is positive.
References
Melamed N, Baschat A, Yinon Y, Athanasiadis A, Mecacci F, Figueras F, et al. FIGO (international Federation of Gynecology and obstetrics) initiative on fetal growth: best practice advice for screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal growth restriction. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2021 Mar;152(Suppl 1):3-57. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13522. PMID: 33740264.
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Electronic address: pubs@smfm.org, Martins JG, Biggio JR, Abuhamad A. Society for maternal-fetal medicine consult series #52: diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction: (replaces clinical guideline number 3, April 2012). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020 Oct;223(4): B2-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020. 05.010. Epub 2020 May 12. PMID: 32407785.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Practice BulletinsdObstetrics and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicin. ACOG practice bulletin No. 204: fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 2019 Feb;133(2): e97-109. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003070. PMID: 30681542.
Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Da Silva Costa F, Deter RL, Figueras F, Ghi T, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: ultrasound assessment of fetal biometry and growth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019 Jun;53(6):715-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20272. PMID: 31169958
McCowan LM, Figueras F, Anderson NH. Evidence-based national guidelines for the management of suspected fetal growth restriction: comparison, consensus, and controversy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018 Feb;218(2S): S855-68. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.ajog.2017.12.004. PMID: 29422214.
Institute of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Royal College of Physicians of Ireland. Fetal growth restriction, recognition, diagnosis management. Clinical practice guideline no. 28; 2017. Version 1.1. Available at: http://www.hse.ie/eng/services/ publications/Clinical-Strategyand-Programmes/Fetal-Growth-Restriction.pdf. [Accessed 10 September 2017]. March 2014. Updated March 2017.
Vayssi_ere C, Sentilhes L, Ego A, Bernard C, Cambourieu D, Flamant C, et al. Fetal growth restriction and intra-uterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2015 Oct; 193:10-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.06.021. Epub 2015 Jul 2. PMID: 26207980.
New Zealand Maternal Fetal Medicine Network. Guideline for the management of suspected small for gestational age singleton pregnancies and infants after 34 wk’ gestation. New Zealand Maternal Fetal Medicine Network; 2014.
Lausman A, Kingdom J, Maternal Fetal Medicine Committee. Intrauterine growth restriction: screening, diagnosis, and management. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2013 Aug;35(8):741-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30865-3. English, French PMID: 24007710.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. The investigation and management of the small-for-gestational-age fetus. second ed. Green-top guideline no. 31. 2013; 2013 Available at: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/ guidelines/gtg_31.pdf. [Accessed 23 March 2021].
Burton GJ, Jauniaux E. Pathophysiology of placental-derived fetal growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018 Feb; 218(2S): S745-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.577. PMID: 29422210.
Zur RL, Kingdom JC, Parks WT, Hobson SR. The placental basis of fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 2020 Mar;47(1):81-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2019.10.008. Epub 2019 Dec 18. PMID: 32008673.
Aviram A, Sherman C, Kingdom J, Zaltz A, Barrett J, Melamed N. Defining early vs late fetal growth restriction by placental pathology. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2019 Mar;98(3):365-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13499. Epub 2018 Nov 22. PMID: 30372519.
Tveit JV, Saastad E, Stray-Pedersen B, Børdahl PE, Flenady V, Fretts R, et al. Reduction of late stillbirth with the introduction of fetal movement information and guidelines - a clinical quality improvement. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2009 Jul 22;9: 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-9-32. Erratum in: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010; 10:49. PMID: 19624847; PMCID: PMC2734741.
Smith GC, Crossley JA, Aitken DA, Jenkins N, Lyall F, Cameron AD, et al. Circulating angiogenic factors in early pregnancy and the risk of preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, spontaneous preterm birth, and stillbirth. Obstet Gynecol 2007 Jun;109(6):1316-24. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000265804.09161.0d. PMID: 17540803.
McLaughlin K, Snelgrove JW, Audette MC, Syed A, Hobson SR, Windrim RC, et al. PlGF (placental growth factor) testing in clinical practice: evidence from a Canadian tertiary maternity referral center. Hypertension 2021 Jun;77(6):2057-65. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.17047. Epub 2021 Apr 12. PMID: 33840202.
Wright E, Audette MC, Ye XY, Keating S, Hoffman B, Lye SJ, et al. Maternal vascular malperfusion and adverse perinatal outcomes in low-risk nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 2017 Nov;130(5):1112e20. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG. 0000000000002264. PMID: 29016509.
Guy GP, Leslie K, Diaz Gomez D, Forenc K, Buck E, Khalil A, et al. Implementation of routine first trimester combined screening for pre-eclampsia: a clinical effectiveness study. BJOG 2021 Jan;128(2):149-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471- 0528.16361. Epub 2020 Jul 1. PMID: 32613730.
Ting JY, Kingdom JC, Shah PS. Antenatal glucocorticoids, magnesium sulfate, and mode of birth in preterm fetal small for gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018 Feb;218(2S):S818e28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.227. PMID: 29422213.
Lees CC, Marlow N, van Wassenaer-Leemhuis A, Arabin B, Bilardo CM, Brezinka C, et al. TRUFFLE study group. 2 year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction (TRUFFLE): a randomised trial. Lancet 2015 May 30;385(9983):2162e72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62049-3. Epub 2015 Mar 5. Erratum in: Lancet. 2015 May 30;385(9983):2152. PMID: 25747582.
GRIT Study Group. A randomised trial of timed delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: short term outcomes and Bayesian interpretation. BJOG 2003 Jan;110(1):27-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-0328(02)02514-4. PMID: 12504932.
Thornton JG, Hornbuckle J, Vail A, Spiegelhalter DJ, Levene M, GRIT study group. Infant wellbeing at 2 years of age in the Growth Restriction Intervention Trial (GRIT): multicentred randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004 Aug 7-13;364(9433): 513-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16809-8. PMID: 15302194.
Lees C, Marlow N, Arabin B, Bilardo CM, Brezinka C, Derks JB, et al., TRUFFLE Group. Perinatal morbidity and mortality in early-onset fetal growth restriction: cohort outcomes of the trial of randomized umbilical and fetal flow in Europe (TRUFFLE). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013 Oct;42(4):400-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.13190. PMID: 24078432.
Boers KE, Vijgen SM, Bijlenga D, van der Post JA, Bekedam DJ, Kwee A, et al. DIGITAT study group. Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT). Br Med J 2010 Dec 21;341:c7087. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c7087. PMID: 21177352; PMCID: PMC3005565.
Boers KE, van Wyk L, van der Post JA, Kwee A, van Pampus MG, Spaanderdam ME, et al., DIGITAT Study Group. Neonatal morbidity after induction vs expectant monitoring in intrauterine growth restriction at term: a subanalysis of the DIGITAT RCT. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012 Apr;206(4): 344.e1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.01.015. Epub 2012 Jan 13. PMID: 22342897.
Vijgen SM, Boers KE, Opmeer BC, Bijlenga D, Bekedam DJ, Bloemenkamp KW, et al. Economic analysis comparing induction of labour and expectant management for intrauterine growth restriction at term (DIGITAT trial). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013 Oct;170(2):358-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.07.017. Epub 2013 Aug 1. PMID: 23910171.
Bijlenga D, Boers KE, Birnie E, Mol BW, Vijgen SC, Van der Post JA, et al. Maternal health-related quality of life after induction of labor or expectant monitoring in pregnancy complicated by intrauterine growth retardation beyond 36 weeks. Qual Life Res 2011 Nov;20(9):1427-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9891-x. Epub 2011 Apr 6. PMID: 21468753; PMCID: PMC3195683.
Tajik P, vanWyk L, Boers KE, le Cessie S, Zafarmand MH, Roumen F, et al., DIGITAT Study Group. Which intrauterine growth restricted fetuses at term benefit from early labour induction? A secondary analysis of the DIGITAT randomised trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014 Jan; 172:20-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.10.014. Epub 2013 Oct 16. PMID: 24192662.
Selvaratnam RJ, Wallace EM, Wolfe R, Anderson PJ, Davey MA. Association between iatrogenic delivery for suspected fetal growth restriction and childhood school outcomes. J Am Med Assoc 2021 Jul 13;326(2):145e53. https://doi.org/10.1001/ jama.2021.8608. PMID: 34255007; PMCID: PMC8278267.
Silver RM, Blue NR. Delivery before 39 Weeks' gestation for suspected fetal growth restriction: more harm than good? J Am Med Assoc 2021 Jul 13;326(2):135-6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.8381. PMID: 34255017.
Rhoades JS, Rampersad RM, Tuuli MG, Macones GA, Cahill AG, Stout MJ. Delivery outcomes after term induction of labor in small-for-gestational age fetuses. Am J Perinatol 2017 May;34(6):544-9. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1593972. Epub 2016 Nov 4. PMID: 27824403.
Horowitz KM, Feldman D. Fetal growth restriction: risk factors for unplanned primary cesarean delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015;28(18):2131-4. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2014.980807. Epub 2014 Nov 14. PMID: 25354283.
Simeone S, Marchi L, Canarutto R, Pina Rambaldi M, Serena C, Servienti C, et al. Doppler velocimetry and adverse outcome in labor induction for late IUGR. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017 Feb;30(3):323-8. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058. 2016.1171839. Epub 2016 Apr 19. PMID: 27020201.
Cruz-Martínez R, Figueras F, Hernandez-Andrade E, Oros D, Gratacos E. Fetal brain Doppler to predict cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status in term small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 2011 Mar;117(3):618-26. https://doi. org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820b0884. PMID: 21343765.
Haas DM, Daggy J, Flannery KM, Dorr ML, Bonsack C, Bhamidipalli SS, et al. A comparison of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for cervical ripening in women for labor induction at term (the IMPROVE trial): a triple-masked randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019 Sep;221(3): 259.e1-259.e16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.037. Epub 2019 May 7. PMID: 31075246; PMCID: PMC7692024.
Duro-G_omez J, Garrido-Oyarzún MF, Rodríguez-Marín AB, de la Torre Gonz_alez AJ, Arjona-Berral JE, Castelo-Branco C. Efficacy and safety of misoprostol, dinoprostone and Cook's balloon for labour induction in women with foetal growth restriction at term. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017 Oct;296(4):777-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4492-8. Epub 2017 Aug 22. PMID: 28831553.
Rossi RM,Warshak CR, Masters HR, Regan JK, Kritzer SA, Magner KP. Comparison of prostaglandin and mechanical cervical ripening in the setting of small for gestational age neonates. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2019 Nov;32(22):3841-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2018.1474873. Epub 2018 May 27. PMID: 29739262.
Chavakula PR, Benjamin SJ, Abraham A, Londhe V, Jeyaseelan V, Mathews JE. Misoprostol versus Foley catheter insertion for induction of labor in pregnancies affected by fetal growth restriction. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015 May;129(2):152-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.11.018. Epub 2015 Jan 29. PMID: 25661322.
Familiari A, Khalil A, Rizzo G, Odibo A, Vergani P, Buca D, et al. Adverse intrapartum outcome in pregnancies complicated by small for gestational age and late fetal growth restriction undergoing induction of labor with Dinoprostone, Misoprostol or mechanical methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020 Sep;252: 455-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.07.020. Epub 2020 Jul 18. PMID: 32738675.
Duro-G_omez J, Garrido-Oyarzún MF, Rodríguez-Marín AB, de la Torre Gonz_alez AJ, Arjona-Berral JE, et al. What can we do to reduce the associated costs in induction of labour of intrauterine growth restriction foetuses at term? A cost-analysis study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017 Sep;296(3):483e8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4458-x. Epub 2017 Jul 11. PMID: 28698953.
Foeller ME, Cruz MO, Kominiarek MA, JU Hibbard. Does induction with misoprostol impact the small for gestational age neonate? Am J Perinatol 2015 Dec;32(14):1311-7. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1563718. Epub 2015 Sep 9. PMID: 26352682.
Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y, Glickman H, Kaplan B, Hod M, Bar J. Mode of delivery in pregnancies with suspected fetal growth restriction following induction of labor with vaginal prostaglandin E2. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004 Jan;83(1):52-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2004.00272.x. PMID: 14678086.
Villalain C, Herraiz I, Quezada MS, G_omez Arriaga P, Sim_on E, G_omez-Montes E, et al. Labor induction in late-onset fetal growth restriction: Foley balloon versus vaginal dinoprostone. Fetal Diagn Ther 2019;46(1):67-74. https://doi.org/10.1159/ 000491784. Epub 2018 Sep 24. PMID: 30248665.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 American Journal of Medical and Clinical Research & Reviews
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.